Please note the TerritorialAuthorityRoleType value set RFC is captured in InfoRMS (Infoway Request Management System): https://informs.infoway-inforoute.ca/browse/HL-5340. For those who are interested in tracking the RFC can click on the link and log in using the same user name and password to access this HL7 Community to look at the RFC and add yourself as a watcher on this RFC.

Best regards,
Wendy Huang

Hi Alan,

Yes that is correct.

Hi Wendy, just to confirm, if we wanted to communicate the "Licensing authority" assigned role, we'd send:

<code code="21581000087102" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.96"/>

Correct?

On the January 5th 2016 monthly HL7 pan-Canadian Standards review call, it was confirmed the TerritorialAuthorityRoleType value set will be implemented and require 2 concepts: licensing authoring and non licensing authority.

The concepts now have the following confirmed details:

Code	Name
21581000087102	Licensing authority (qualifier value)
21591000087100	Non licensing authority (qualifier value)

Terminology: SNOMED CT
Terminology ID: 2.16.840.1.113883.6.96

This information will be updated in the next release of the TerritorialAuthorityRoleType value set.

These are the codes that the regulated colleges are currently sending us to our PRS product in Alberta:

PRAC
ENH
EXP
TIME
REGISTRY
PCYTYPE
INTERN/RESIDENT
EDUD
COURREG
ACAD
OTH
SPECREG
LOC
AMREG
EMERGENCY
GENERAL
LIMITED
PROVISIONAL
TELEMED

Given that the length is obviously not an issue, why is "HONOR" suggested instead of "HONORARY?"